检索历史 清除

目的 将鼻咽癌调强放疗的自动计划与人工计划进行对比,探讨自动计划在鼻咽癌放疗中是否有优势.方法 回顾性纳入97例鼻咽癌患者,所有患者均在Eclipse治疗计划系统上完成调强放疗人工计划的制作.使用Pinnacle3治疗计划系统的自动计划软件包重新进行调强放疗自动计划制作.统计对比两种计划方式得到的靶区剂量95%靶区体积所对应的剂量、靶区均匀指数和靶区适形指数,正常器官剂量.结果 人工计划和自动计划PTV覆盖率和均匀性相近( P=0. 30).与人工计划相比,自动计划在正常器官保护方面更为出色,平均剂量降低了270~1870 cGy (P=0. 16).结论 自动计划在保证靶区处方剂量的同时能让正常器官的剂量进一步降低,放疗计划的质量有明显提高.

Objective To compare the automatic and manual plans of intensity-modulated radiation therapy ( IMRT ) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and investigate whether the automatic plan possesses advantages over the manual plan. Methods Clinical data of 97 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received IMRT with Eclipse treatment planning system (Version 11. 0) using manual optimization. The same plans were optimized successively in Pinnacle3( version 9. 10 ) treatment planning system using automatic plan software package module (provided by Prof. Zhang XD from MD Anderson Cancer Center).The D95(dose in 95% of planning target volume,PTV),homogeneity index, conformal index and normal organ dose were statistically compared between two plans. Results The PTV coverage and homogeneity did not significantly differ between two plans. Compared with the manual plan,the automatic plan could more effectively protect the normal organs. Two plans significantly differed in a majority of organ at risk (OAR).The mean dose was decreased by 270-1870 cGy. Conclusions For nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients,IMRT via the automatic plan can meet the clinical requirement for target prescription dose and reduce the dose of normal organs.