"This is not a capitulation. It is a commitment."
A Mongabay (brasil.mongabay.com) é uma agência de notícias sobre conservação e ciência ambiental sem fins lucrativos. Nosso objetivo é inspirar, educar e informar.
Red lines. (This post discusses threats to press freedom and may be distressing for some readers. Please proceed with care.) We have entered a new era in the United States—one that carries profound risks for journalism. The assumption that the U.S. will remain a safe environment for independent reporting, especially on issues of power and accountability, is no longer a given. Some will say this is alarmist. That the U.S. still has a free press. That we should focus on real threats to journalism in places like China or Russia. But press freedom does not erode overnight—it frays, piece by piece, until one day, what once seemed unthinkable has become reality. The time to prepare is before it is too late. There is a fine line between fearmongering and foresight. But when an organization supports the livelihoods of many, its leadership has a duty to prepare. The path of an individual may diverge from that of an institution, and organizations must weigh resistance against their responsibility to those they employ. Multiple approaches are possible, but inaction is not one of them. This is why it is critical to define red lines—before shifting baselines lull us into complacency. These conversations must happen internally so that when the moment comes, decisions are made with clarity, not desperation. For obvious reasons, I cannot detail Mongabay’s safeguards or response strategies. But history offers clear warning signs—lines that, once crossed, demand action. These may include: ⚠️ The criminalization or reframing of constitutionally protected journalism as “economic sabotage” or “terrorism.” ⚠️ Journalists being harassed, detained, or killed with impunity. ⚠️ Reporting on environmental activism being cast as support for “subversive” or anti-government elements. ⚠️ Heightened surveillance, asset freezes, or travel restrictions targeting environmental journalists. ⚠️ Media outlets facing crackdowns, forced closures, or foreign agent designations. ⚠️ Laws restricting nonprofit media funding, threatening tax-exempt status, or criminalizing foreign support. ⚠️ Organizational websites, social media accounts, or financial assets being blocked, seized, or restricted. Critics will argue that no one is stopping journalists from doing their jobs, that disapproval of the press is not the same as an attack on press freedom. But press freedom is not just about avoiding outright censorship—it is about ensuring that journalists can report without facing intimidation, legal threats, or financial suffocation. It is about recognizing that criticism of the press is not the same as weaponizing the state to undermine it. None of this means Mongabay is backing down. If anything, it means we must be more strategic, more resilient, and more determined. The goal is not retreat but endurance—ensuring that the work continues no matter what obstacles arise. This is not a capitulation. It is a commitment. - - - Red lines, of course, apply beyond environmental journalism.