Was sind die wichtigsten Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen Continuous Delivery und Continuous Deployment?

Continuous Delivery is the process that ensures the continuous release of the application updates. The key point of continuous delivery is that every change that passes through the test can be released. However, the actual deployment to the production environment will be triggered by the stakeholders. In simple words, In the continuous delivery human intervention is required.

Continuous delivery is a software development practice where code changes are automatically tested and prepared for production deployment at any moment. This approach ensures that the software is continuously deployable, reducing the likelihood of errors and delays in delivering value to customers. By automating and streamlining the deployment process, continuous delivery enhances efficiency and reliability in software development.

Continuous Deployment is an extension of continuous delivery where every change that passes through the automated test will be deployed directly to the production environment automatically without any human intervention. in continuous deployment, the process is fully automated end to end and requires no human intervention at any point.

Continuous deployment is the practice of automatically deploying every code change to production without human intervention, ensuring continuous software updates and shorter feedback loops. To implement continuous deployment successfully, maintain high confidence in software quality and reliability, and foster a culture of rigorous monitoring and testing.

Continuous delivery and continuous deployment both aim to accelerate software delivery through automation, testing, and version control. While they share common goals, they vary in deployment frequency and automation level. Continuous delivery empowers developers to choose when and how to deploy software, offering control and flexibility. In contrast, continuous deployment automates every change deployment, providing customers with enhanced responsiveness and agility.

The similarity between Continuous delivery and deployment is that both approaches rely on automation to streamline the application delivery process. Automated build, test, and deployment make the process easier and help to identify and fix issues early, reducing the risk of defects reaching production. The difference between continuous delivery and deployment is in the deployment process. In delivery, human intervention is required when it comes to the production environment but in continuous deployment, the process is fully automated end to end and requires no human intervention at any point.

Most of the articles in the CD category does not bring any value at all… Tell people to read the classic CD book of 2010 instead of making them loosing their time!

Continuous Delivery requires software to be deployable at all times. All the techniques and practices are aimed to keep software in this state. Continuous Deployment is only different as it proves this promise by automatically deploying each software version that passes the verification steps. The same techniques and practices are needed for both - and the same level of automation is desirable. Many organizations like to control the "go" button, and that's fine, so there is no "better option" here. Use what's appropriate for your organization.

Cont. Delivery and Deploy. help to streamline the release process. This allows for faster releases and feedback, bug detection, and fixing issues early, reducing the risk of defects reaching production. It promotes a culture of continuous improvement by regularly reducing bugs and can identify the areas of optimization and implement changes to increase efficiency. Challenges 1. Changes pushed to prod env automatically increase the risk of bugs and breaking changes. 2. Automated tests are crucial but it can be challenging to create comprehensive test suites that cover all scenarios. 3. In regulated industries Implementing CD while ensuring compliance with regulations can be challenging and requires careful planning and validation processes.

1. Application Nature: If the app is highly critical, the best vigilant approach will be cont. delivery and if the application is less critical we can opt for cont. deployment to enable fast releases. 2. Risk: Cont. deploy. automates the process and deploys the app to prod which can increase the risk of bugs and issues. Cont. Delivery provides us with an additional layer of control and reduces the risk of unintended consequences in production. 3. Testing / QA: The testing must be mature and robust to ensure that the changes deploying in the prod do not create any issue(s). If the testing process is not well established then cont. delivery is the safest option. 4. Frequency of deployment can be one of the factors to choose the approach.

In the Blue/Green deployment technique, you establish two distinct yet identical env's. The current app version is operating in one env (blue), while the updated app version is running in another environment (green). In Canary deployment, the small traffic portion is diverted to the new version. This makes it possible to test the new version will minimal risk. In rolling Deployment new version of the app is deployed gently, typically one instance at a time. This approach ensures high availability and old and deployed versions handle requests until instances are updated. Serverless deployment is where a piece of code is being deployed instead of the entire application and the cloud provider handles the resource allocation and scaling.