Ihr Team schätzt Geschwindigkeit über Qualität. Wie können Sie sicherstellen, dass Aufgaben gründlich und effizient erledigt werden?

1. value clear expectations: Emphasize the importance of quality alongside speed. 2. Define quality standards: Establish measurable quality criteria. 3. Prioritize tasks: Focus on high-impact tasks that require attention to detail. 4. Break tasks into smaller steps: Encourage thoroughness without feeling overwhelmed. 5. Assign quality-focused team members: Pair speed-oriented team members with detail-oriented ones. 6. Regular check-ins: Monitor progress, and address quality concerns promptly. 7. Encourage feedback: Foster open communication to identify quality issues. 8. Provide training: Offer resources to enhance quality-focused skills. 9. Lead by example: Demonstrate commitment to quality in your work. Thanks.

By setting clear process along with role, responsibilities and timeline contribute to completion of tasks with excellent quality.

One thing I've found helpful in assessing workflow is mapping out each step of the process visually. By using flowcharts or diagrams, it's easier to identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies. Actually, I disagree with the notion that frequent meetings are always beneficial. Too many meetings can disrupt workflow and decrease productivity, so it's crucial to find a balance. An example I've seen is a company implementing a Kanban board to manage tasks. This visual tool helped streamline their workflow, improve communication, and increase overall efficiency.

Essa análise do fluxo de trabalho é uma abordagem essencial para melhorar a eficiência e a qualidade das operações. Mapear cada etapa permite uma visão clara dos processos, evidenciando pontos de falha e áreas que podem ser otimizadas. Ao identificar os gargalos, você pode direcionar melhorias que envolvam desde a redistribuição de tarefas até a revisão de procedimentos e a inclusão de controles mais rigorosos. Isso não só melhora a produtividade como também minimiza erros, garantindo uma execução mais fluida e segura. Esse tipo de avaliação contínua é vital, especialmente em operações complexas, onde cada detalhe impacta o resultado final.

Workflow should be reviewed in conjunction with the actual process owners on timely basis and SMART objectives being implemented, achieved and measured regularly. Basically a support mentality should be expressed to the key staffs who manage those process and open and free discussion shall be maintained between the teams. Swift and clear decisions should be delivered by the immediate superiors and always give freedom of work with clearly specified boundaries to make decisions will enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes. Risk assessment and its monitoring and measurements are must and critical functions shall be ensured and evaluated via transparent operational controls.

Things I've found helpful in setting clear goals is using the SMART criteria—making sure goals are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. This framework ensures goals are clear and actionable. Actually, I disagree with setting too many goals at once. It can overwhelm the team and dilute focus. Prioritizing a few key objectives can be more effective. An example I've seen is a team setting quarterly OKRs (Objectives and Key Results). This method helped them stay aligned and track progress towards their main goals throughout the quarter.

Always while dealing with feedbacks all entities go for an NPI scores system which is basically an old way of doing. Make the employees feel that all simple and complex opinions highlighted by them were counted, valued and evaluated throughly without biased judgments and encourage and support them to convert it into fruitful projects in which they will have the control and authority to set, sort, plan n implement which will be reviewed in each stages and not be a dictating n sleeping authority try to experience it together by sharing the knowledge and guiding them properly without assigning responsibility n tasks and acting like a sleeping boss and questioning them at the end of the year prior to appraisals and or annual bonus negotiations.

Doing it right at the first time need to enforce within the team. Regular check is a good starting point, especially working on any project. No harm to do more on-going quality check. Weekly one on one team member meeting provides feedback any issue impact on task completion. At the same time you can also get feedback how tasks are completed thoroughly and efficiency.

Para conseguir conciliar a qualidade e a produtividade é fundamental conhecer os membros do seu time, saber os pontos fortes e os a melhorar de cada um, extraindo assim o melhor de cada colaborador, ter a visão do processo como um todo e saber identificar as falhas, para corrigi lás rapidamente. Para se ter uma equipe de alta performance é fundamental ter pessoas engajadas com o processo, como em um time vencedor, o trabalho em equipe é fundamental para o sucesso. Para obtenção da boa performance do time, o uso de treinamentos e uma comunicação de qualidade entre o emissor e o receptor são ferramentas importantíssimas. A comunicação eficaz e eficiente são imprescindíveis para organizar o time e assim obter um resultado extraordinário.

A strong audit system is needed to track and enhance the quality of operations. It is possible for your team to prioritise quality after speed to increase visible throughput. If you reinforce a well thought of audit system, which accounts for bulk analysis and anomaly detection with context to the operation, your team will not only feel the need to keep quality in mind, but also focus on efficiency. This is the ideal atmosphere that you may want to create within your team.

Technically don’t complicate the process and don’t overload the staffs. If the staff’s were given with max. 75 to 80% load only they can effectively handle the tasks with 100% efficiency; whereas now a days the trend is to overload the staffs with 120% or + % of work load and the errors or mistakes and costs associated with with its corrections are much heavy often and will end up with unsatisfied internal and external customers eventually.