Sie haben Schwierigkeiten, eine große Gruppendiskussion zu führen. Wie können Sie das Gespräch selbstbewusst führen?

Setting an agenda helps folks to follow what's going on and to repeat the next steps a lot. Sum up speakers' points very briefly to allow for a natural transition as people participate. As leader, it's up to you to proactively guide discussions, remind everyone of the main points at hand (hence the repetitive factor), and keep things moving. Something that's been effective for me is invoking pauses and a lot of patience. I think we are oftentimes keen to fill the space with noise. Ever notice when you ask a question and pause for up to a minute how folks start participating or it allows a reprieve of sorts? Incorporate other modalities like journaling or responding to prompts which slows the energy down and encourages people to pause.

To lead large group discussions effectively you have to set the scene from the start confidently and establish your credentials or why you are facilitating. This reassures the group and builds trust because participants will appreciate the experience you bring to the session. You can then explain how the session will pan out - these rules make everyone feel comfortable and are important to show that everyone’s contribution is valued and in what way that will take place.

1.First thing to know, if you don't establish you are in- charge, you may be charged with incompetence. Struggles begin with not identifying who pilots the boat before sailing. 2. People are people, so don't expect too much. Understanding of human nature is vital. Do you know what drives humans? Go to your sessions with this mindset, even in facilitation too. 3. Assert your role, not your domination. You are not their parent. Be clear about this. Adults handle control very differently. Show strength and capacity to tackle behaviour, and not the individual. 4. Set mutually agreed upon rules. Let people speak, but whey they do more than speaking to accusing, let there be friendly checkers. 5. Hold their hands, not their legs. Lead them.

Set clear guidelines at the start. Explain how long each person can speak. Ask people to raise hands before talking. No interrupting others. Stay on topic. Be respectful of all views. Write these rules where everyone can see them. Remind the group of the rules if needed. Have consequences for breaking rules. Start and end the discussion on time. These rules create structure. They help everyone know what to expect. Clear rules make the discussion run smoothly.

Its imperative that discussions should start with a clear understanding of the issue in hand and options to be deliberated. Its always good to do a bit of housekeeping before starting the group discussions, like do's and don'ts and method of noting down alternative options and evaluating them on preferred factor for the case like Cost and benefit analysis.. or arriving on worst case scenario by deduction.

That's one skill all leader should have.. "Listen to understand" and Should never go for "Listen to respond". As leader you are facilitator for ideation is a group discussions, sometime team members are so engrossed in discussion for a particular direction that they forget the "out of the box thoughts" to resolve the issue. as an active listener and as a leader, you have much wider understanding of the issue, you may pick up a latent clue from these discussions to arrive on solution with a totally different perspective.

Pay close attention to each speaker. Make eye contact. Nod to show you're listening. Take notes on key points. Repeat back what you heard to check understanding. Ask follow-up questions. Don't interrupt. Show interest in all views, even if you disagree. Encourage others to listen too. Active listening shows respect. It helps speakers feel heard. It also helps you guide the talk better. You'll catch important ideas this way.

Call on quiet members to share their thoughts. Use open-ended questions to spark discussion. Break into smaller groups for shy people. Use voting or polls to get everyone involved. Praise good contributions. Create a safe space for all views. Don't let a few people dominate. Give equal time to different perspectives. Use icebreakers to make people comfortable. Encourage building on others' ideas. This helps everyone feel valued. It brings out diverse viewpoints.

It was a cross-business compliance assessment of a new regulation in an export market. The teams were given a brief idea about Our understanding of the regulation and its impact on businesses. Businesses team comprised of technical and Export Managers were allowed to narrow down the impact assessment session from macro to micro level, means starting from point 1- if regulation impact the business adversely or NOT, If YES, 2- Go to next level of cost and benefit analysis and 3- It is a must to have Compliance OR its just good to have it 4- If must, then Cost is immaterial point, we will work on compliance and cost would be optimised in due course 5- learning from other's experiences, like from competitors, peers in other domain etc

Gently steer off-topic comments back to the main subject. Remind the group of the discussion goals. Use transitions to move between topics. Summarize key points to refocus attention. Ask how comments relate to the main issue. Set time limits for each topic. Use a visual agenda to track progress. Park interesting but unrelated ideas for later. Be firm but polite when redirecting. This keeps the discussion on track. It helps achieve the meeting's goals.

Stay calm and neutral. Address the issue, not the person. Find common ground between opposing views. Use "I" statements to defuse tension. Take breaks if emotions run high. Remind everyone of shared goals. Don't let personal attacks happen. Acknowledge all feelings. Look for win-win solutions. Use humor carefully to lighten the mood. Seek compromise when views clash. This keeps the discussion productive. It prevents arguments from derailing the talk.

You need to act as Impartial judge.. and establish that you are playing by rules.. One such way is that you cross question all the idea as Devil's advocate and let them defend their positions on merits