Wie gehen Sie mit Risiken und Problemen bei der Projektabwicklung in einer agilen oder hybriden Projektabwicklungsumgebung um?

Many fail at basics such as what is a risk vs an issue. Issue is an item that has happened and requires a response. Issues are usually dealt with by either resolving or accepting as-is. Risk is an item that has not happened yet. Risks are usually dealt with by creating a mitigation strategy. Risks need to be evaluated for possibility of occurrence and impact. Don't get bog down into documenting every possible risk, its just not worth it. Issues and risks can be both positive and negative occurrences. Many forget that not choosing an action is also a choice that has corresponding consequences. You cannot predict 'black swan' risks - those you have to deal with as they occur. Document in the RAID and review with SteerCo as a sanity check.

In agile or hybrid environments, manage risks by regularly identifying, assessing, and prioritizing them. Utilize techniques like risk mitigation strategies, continuous monitoring, and adapting plans accordingly. Encourage open communication among team members to swiftly address emerging issues. Agile's iterative nature allows for timely adjustments, while hybrid approaches integrate structured risk management with agile flexibility, ensuring proactive risk mitigation throughout project delivery.

What's missing is the 'exploit' response. When a positive issue or risks occurs, most managers usually 'accept' it. The proper action is to 'exploit' it to accelerate and magnify the benefits. Again, don't mix issues with risks. These are two different types of actions and they do require different responses. For example, an issue is when you drive and have an accident. You have not insurance. Police may arrest you. IF you caused the accident, you are personally liable for ALL costs. The proper ways is to think about future actions as a risk. If you drive a car, it is possible that you might have an accident. That possible future (an accident) is a risk that you need to mitigate by getting a car insurance.

Serrador & Pinto (2015) laid down 4 factors of successful project outcomes (on scope, cost, timeline & with utmost customer satisfaction). That's how all issues and risks needs to be evaluated. Monitoring & controlling has such a waterfall-ish meaning. Why not (1) having a plan (yeah, a shocker), or (2) consistently communicating top impacting issues and managing them to resolution (that's PM-ing 400-level), or (3) 'hedging against the risks' (a PhD in Project Management).

In Agile or hybrid project delivery in the energy sector, manage risks and issues through continuous monitoring and adaptive strategies. Utilize regular retrospectives to identify improvements. In a hybrid solar project, regular communication and iterative adjustments mitigated supply chain disruptions. In an Agile offshore wind farm development, adaptive planning and collaborative problem-solving addressed unforeseen technical challenges. The key is to foster a culture of transparency, quick issue identification, and flexible problem-solving to enhance project resilience in the dynamic energy landscape.

Understanding the basics of risk versus issue is crucial. An issue is a current problem requiring action, while a risk is a potential future problem that needs a mitigation plan. Risk identification is crucial to have risk mitigation plan. Here's a concise list of risk identification models: Brainstorming SWOT Analysis Checklists Retrospective Delphi Techniques Risk Registers Root Cause Analysis Scenarios nalysis These models help teams systematically identify potential risks associated with a project.