Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

WATER FLOW RATES FROM A SITE-SPECIFIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 22(1): 73-78. (doi: 10.13031/2013.20194) @2006
Authors:   K. C. Stone, E. J. Sadler, J. A. Millen, D. E. Evans, C. R. Camp
Keywords:   Site-specific agriculture, Irrigation, Site-specific irrigation, Center pivot

Site-specific irrigation is defined as delivering different prescribed depths of water to specific areas in irrigated fields. Since the 1990s, site-specific irrigation research has been expanded to include the delivery of water and nutrients to specific field areas based on soil type, soil moisture status, crop needs, and other user-defined objectives. A site-specific center pivot irrigation system was designed and installed in a field with highly variable soils of the U.S. eastern coastal plain. The system consisted of 13 segments along the 140-m length of the three-tower center pivot with three delivery manifolds in each segment. The system was designed to apply approximately 12.5 mm of water in any selected segment when operated at 50% travel velocity. Quantifying water application depth and uniformity from the site-specific irrigation system is essential to documenting the systems performance and interpreting experimental results. We developed a measurement system to evaluate the water delivery rates of the irrigation system. We compared the measured water delivery from each segment of the site-specific irrigation system to the design parameters. We found that the irrigation system was delivering water to the control areas at rates approximately as it was designed. A total of 77 segment and manifold combinations were tested. Of these 77 combinations, we found that 7 had flow rates greater than 10% different from the design flows. The manifolds with the lower flow rates typically were more likely to differ significantly from their design values. This was most likely related to potential clogging of the low flow nozzles that have smaller orifices. When the manifolds were used in combination, they compensated for each other and produced application depths near the design depths.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)

 

  翻译: