Está navegando por opiniones contradictorias de las partes interesadas sobre los planes de contingencia. ¿Cómo puedes encontrar el mejor enfoque?

Once you have gathered all of the stakeholder inputs & understand their perspectives, constraints, & restraints, find the best path forward that meets the overall business objective (the true critical path). This path forward should be a direction that meets the business need, on time & within budget, but impacts the least amount of stakeholder teams. Not everyone will be happy, some will feel they were not listened to or counter that the chosen method impacts their area significantly (risk management). Communications with all parties involved are key to demonstrate the chosen path was the best business decision. Senior leaders rarely like to see the math, but a quick run down of how the path was selected may gain buy-in.

It is always useful to design and facilitate a training exercise which can highlight gaps in approaches taken to contingency planning. Consider an exercise involving the conflicting stakeholders and use it to highlight gaps and agree a common approach to the planning process.

To navigate conflicting stakeholder opinions on contingency plans, actively listen and understand each party's needs. Facilitated discussions are essential to ensure all voices align with organizational goals. Stakeholder mapping is helpful for prioritizing perspectives based on influence and impact. However, I disagree with rushing decisions just to appease everyone, as it can lead to poor outcomes. For instance, in a previous project with conflicting views on resource allocation, taking time to analyze priorities and engage in open dialogue led to a balanced plan that mitigated risks and strengthened trust among the team.

Gather stake holder inputs and then identify "wiggle room" on their requirements. In my experience, requirements such as these come directly from their leadership via directives, guidance, or policy. If you can identify these, it will help you navigate what they would like vs. what must be done. Ultimately, you will rarely make everyone happy, but the goal is to find a palatable compromise. For those issues that seem to be insolvable, but will significantly improve the outcome, you may have to engage your leadership to engage the other stakeholder's leadership. Before doing this, make sure you can explain why the engagement is necessary and how the engagement dramatically impacts results/outcomes.

Once you understand each stakeholder’s needs, the next step is to find common ground. Often, despite apparent conflicts, there are shared objectives that can serve as a foundation for building a unified contingency plan. In the case of the World Cup, despite differing opinions from local authorities or FIFA, we managed to align our plans by focusing on the mutual goal of ensuring a seamless and safe event. This involved making concessions in areas where it was possible while standing firm on non-negotiable aspects, ensuring that all parties felt heard and respected.

Indeed, we need to identifying the specific risks each stakeholder perceives. Analyze these risks based on factors such as likelihood and impact. Use objective criteria like data analysis, historical trends, and expert input to assess the validity of each concern. Engage stakeholders in collaborative discussions to prioritize risks and find common ground. When necessary, use decision-making frameworks like weighted scoring or cost-benefit analysis to ensure a balanced approach, and document all decisions transparently.

Absolutely! Evaluating risks is important in planning, especially when stakeholders disagree. By identifying and assessing risks, you can create a strong plan. A clear risk assessment helps everyone understand why certain actions are needed and where compromises might be necessary.

When stakeholders have conflicting opinions, risk evaluation becomes a tool for driving compromise. By objectively assessing and presenting the risks associated with different contingency plans, you can create a common understanding of why certain measures are necessary. For example, in large-scale events, differing opinions on compounds locations are common. By evaluating the risks associated and how certain measures mitigate high-priority risks, we were able to bring all stakeholders on board, even if it required some compromise.

Evaluar los riesgos implica identificar tanto los riesgos obvios como los menos evidentes. Una evaluación integral debería incluir un análisis de los riesgos potenciales, su probabilidad de ocurrencia y su impacto. Contar con herramientas de análisis de datos puede mejorar la precisión en esta etapa.

When evaluating risks in negotiations, go beyond surface analysis to assess the full spectrum of potential impacts. Identify all possible risks, considering not just financial but also reputational, operational, and strategic implications. Engage stakeholders for insights that may reveal overlooked vulnerabilities. Prioritize actions based on a comprehensive risk assessment, ensuring that contingency plans are robust and aligned with organizational goals. This holistic approach mitigates threats while positioning the organization to capitalize on opportunities others might miss.

Una vez identificadas las necesidades y evaluados los riesgos, es necesario priorizar los objetivos. Esto implica decidir qué aspectos son más críticos y deben ser abordados primero. La priorización debe basarse en criterios claros y objetivos, como el impacto en la operación o la alineación con los objetivos estratégicos.

When navigating conflicting stakeholder opinions, I first seek to understand each perspective by actively listening to concerns and priorities. I then focus on common goals, highlighting areas of agreement. From there, I facilitate collaborative discussions to explore different options, using data and evidence to guide the conversation. By balancing short-term needs with long-term objectives and ensuring all voices are heard, I can build consensus around the most effective contingency plan that aligns with the company's overall strategy

Identify Core Objectives: Define and prioritize the most critical goals of the contingency plan (e.g., public safety, essential services). Stakeholder Alignment: Engage stakeholders to align on these core objectives, ensuring all plans are evaluated against them. Evaluate Impact: Assess the impact of each plan based on how well it meets the prioritized objectives. Facilitate Consensus: Encourage stakeholder compromises that support the key goals. Decision-Making Framework: Use a structured framework to systematically select the best approach based on priority objectives.

Es importante jerarquizar el cumplimiento de los objetivos, esto puede ser de acuerdo a la orientación del escaló superior; o bien debido a condiciones extrinsecas que limiten el cumplimiento de algunos y que no afecten a otros (plazos, condiciones mutuantes, etc). Una vez hecha esta jerarquía establecer un plan de accion para alcanzarlos, este debe tener limitaciones de tiempos, estado final deseado y responsables (como mínimo).

À ce niveau il faire le Security Level management ou connaître le niveau de sécurité. Surtout jouer sur des leviers comme le contrôle organisationnel, le contrôle lié aux activités des personnes, contrôle technologique et le contré physique.

En esta etapa, se deben explorar diversas soluciones y enfoques. Es útil considerar diferentes escenarios y preparar respuestas para cada uno. El desarrollo de alternativas es más eficaz cuando se aprovecha la experiencia del equipo y se fomenta la creatividad.

L’élaboration une politique global est obligatoire pour revoir les procédures d’évacuation et la durée de validité. Ensuite tout cela en œuvre afin de l’adapter à la réalité du terrain.

Building consensus among stakeholders is crucial for effective contingency planning. It involves finding common ground and ensuring all voices are heard. This process requires excellent communication skills and the ability to facilitate discussions that lead to shared understanding and agreement. By focusing on the larger goal of organizational resilience, stakeholders can work together to create robust contingency plans. Emphasizing unity and collaboration helps in overcoming conflicts and ensures that the organization is well-prepared for any potential disruptions.

Obtaining consensus is the top most priority of the person handling these issues .it needs clear understanding of business strategy, budiness plans ,tactical and operational implementation issues and risk assessment/management options. He must be aware of leverag ,the organisation possesses. It is also the test of his/her negotiation skills and the level of understanding of strategic objectives of the organisation. Ultimately, consensus has to be achieved in order to converge efforts of all stakeholders towards achievement of organisational goals

This is a great way to form a strong team. Foster understanding throughout the stakeholders by clearly articulating the problem that must be solved together. If done effectively, everyone feels part of the way ahead and invests in the solution.

ograr un acuerdo entre las partes interesadas es clave para la implementación exitosa de cualquier plan de contingencia. Este paso requiere una comunicación clara y la disposición para negociar y encontrar puntos en común. La transparencia y la confianza son fundamentales para construir un consenso sólido.

Building consensus among stakeholders requires a blend of active listening, strategic communication, and shared vision. Start by ensuring that every stakeholder feels heard and understood—acknowledge their concerns and motivations openly. Use this understanding to identify common goals and areas of agreement, then build on these to bridge gaps. Frame solutions in terms of mutual benefits, and be transparent about trade-offs. Foster a collaborative environment where all parties contribute to the final decision, which not only strengthens buy-in but also solidifies the commitment needed to move forward collectively.

Finalmente, la implementación de las decisiones requiere precisión y agilidad. Es importante que las decisiones se tomen de manera oportuna y que se mantenga la flexibilidad para ajustarse a nuevas circunstancias o información. La clave está en asegurar que todos los involucrados estén alineados y comprometidos con la ejecución del plan.