Transparency has to be followed but accountability has to be given importance in such matters. Information which is out in the public domain may be promptly released, but where third party information is concerned, the party's submission should be seriously considered before disclosure. It is a difficult and close call and such information could be revealed only when public interest surpasses the chances of impairment and violation of individual privacy. Interpretation of rules should not be made a shield to protect misconduct of erring public servants and public figures, however powerful they may be. Lastly, considerable discernment should be displayed in sensitive matters related to defence, health,strategic research and privy issues.

Very important recognize privacy laws that safeguard sensitive information, including health records, personal identifiers, and confidential data. Establish Clear Policies,Procedures for redacting sensitive details before releasing records.

A busca pelo equilíbrio entre o direito à informação e a proteção da privacidade é um dos grandes desafios do nosso tempo, especialmente na era digital. Por um lado, a transparência e o acesso à informação são pilares fundamentais de uma democracia. Por outro, a coleta e o uso indevido de dados pessoais podem violar direitos individuais e gerar diversos problemas, como a discriminação e o roubo de identidade.

Public records are essential for accountability, allowing citizens to scrutinize government actions. However, privacy concerns arise when sensitive personal information is involved. To find the right equilibrium, agencies should implement clear guidelines that prioritize the release of non-sensitive information while safeguarding personal data. This can include redacting identifying details or using aggregation techniques to protect individuals' privacy. Additionally, establishing a transparent process for handling requests can enhance public trust. Engaging stakeholders in discussions about privacy and transparency can also foster a collaborative approach, ensuring that both public interests and individual rights are respected.

Absolutely! To cut the long story short, knowing the real and sensitive difference between what is public and what is personal, strikes the equilibrium. The discretion then emerges out of this difference that works in tandem with the concerned rules thereby respecting the privacy of the individual and owning the public responsibility, simultaneously.