¿Cómo se pueden integrar sistemas ERP sin middleware?

You can skip middleware for SAP integration, but consider the trade-offs. Direct Integration (Web Services): * Pro: Simpler architecture, potentially lower cost. * Con: More complex development, tight coupling, less flexibility. Recommendation: Middleware offers easier development, better scalability, and stronger security. Choose based on your specific needs.

One approach is using a service-oriented architecture (SOA), where each module of the ERP system exposes its functionality as a service, allowing other systems to directly interact with it. Another method is through database-level integration, where systems share a common database or establish direct database connections for data exchange. Both methods require thorough understanding of the systems involved and careful implementation to maintain data integrity and security.

One out of three ERP projects suffers from a communication failure, according to the PMI report. Communication is a critical skill to the success of any project, especially ERP projects. Any successful project manager will tell you that communicating effectively and efficiently is the key to minimizing mistakes and preventing missed deadlines or unmet expectations.

From my experience, using middleware for ERP integration streamlines the process, enhances data management and security, reduces costs, and optimizes process automation. Conversely, without middleware, ERP integration becomes complex and expensive, increases error risks, complicates maintenance and updates, and can jeopardize data security and integrity, impacting the overall efficiency of the business.

Integrating ERP without middleware streamlines processes,cuts costs, and boosts efficiency. Direct integration eradicates middleware complexity, reducing data inconsistencies. As tech advances, ERP-middleware-free integration gains traction for agile solutions. Compatibility: Ensure ERP fits existing apps & databases. Custom APIs: Build APIs for direct ERP communication with other systems. Data Standardization: Enforce uniform data formats. Real-time Sync: Keep info current, no delays. Centralized Data Hub: ERP hub aggregates from various sources, no middleware. Testing: Continuously monitor & resolve integration issues. AI : With the help of detailed process documents ,several ERP processes can be implemented with more tech strokes by AI.

Web services and webhooks: Explore if the ERP systems support web services or webhooks. Web services allow communication between different systems over the internet using standard protocols (e.g., SOAP, REST). You can leverage web services to exchange data and invoke functionalities between ERP systems. Webhooks, on the other hand, enable real-time notifications and event-driven interactions between systems, allowing you to trigger actions or updates in one ERP system based on events in another.

Integrating secure web services into an ERP system elevates it beyond basic business management, offering limitless flexibility and optimization capabilities. This transforms a standard ERP into a powerful tool conducive to innovation and business process customization.

I think that web services and the next topic of cloud-based platforms as Integration Middleware. I don't understand why the original authors see these as direct point-to-point integration. Another example is SFTP services which we generally use as a middleware between SAP ERP and banks (payroll, vendor payments, etc). these are simple and cheap integration tools that I consider Integration Middleware.

API-based integration: Check if the ERP systems provide Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that allow direct interaction with their functionalities and data. APIs enable programmatic access to specific features or data within the ERP system, allowing you to build custom integrations. You can utilize APIs to extract, transform, and load data between systems, as well as trigger actions or workflows in one system based on events in another.

Cloud-based ERP systems offer scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, but their suitability varies with each business's specific needs. Decisions to adopt should consider factors like data security, regulatory compliance, and system integration, ensuring alignment with a business's unique goals.

In my personal opinion and based on my experience, a holistic integration strategy is indispensable and absolutely necessary in the context of ERP implementations. Other integration scenarios have significant weaknesses such as a lack of monitoring, scalability and innovation. Especially in the context of complex architectures, you should always rely on a central platform.

I'm with Tobias Mache who says that a "holistic integration strategy is indispensable". Point-to-point for single-purpose integrations is a myopic view. It could lead to dozens of uncoordinated integration points that must be individually managed. Each integration is likely developed to different standards by different teams and requires a complex support structure after going live. An Integration Middleware solution will enable a stable and standard environment for the business and IT operations

Web services and webhooks: Explore if the ERP systems support web services or webhooks. Web services allow communication between different systems over the internet using standard protocols (e.g., SOAP, REST). You can leverage web services to exchange data and invoke functionalities between ERP systems. Webhooks, on the other hand, enable real-time notifications and event-driven interactions between systems, allowing you to trigger actions or updates in one ERP system based on events in another.

Je direkter die Anbindung und je mehr Schnittstellen aktiviert sind, umso mehr muss das ERP in einem Hochverfügbarkeitsbereich integriert werden. Es gilt zu vermeiden, daß durch downtime , wenn auch nur geplant, Connectoren einen negativen Request erhalten. Die nachträgliche Betreuung und Reaktivierung kann ungewohnte Mehraufwand kosten