¿Cuáles son las tecnologías y herramientas de autenticación más recientes para mantener sus datos seguros?

Biometric authentication is more secure, effective prevent phishing. But below are some cons: 1. difficult when get biometric sampling (as Iphone get face id sampling) 2. false positive. when we got first failed, will next failed and then the account will be locked as policy then must use code to unlock :D 3.When you are kidnapped, it is easier to be exploited and unlocked by using your fingerprint or face rather than using a password. Because if you use a password, it's in your head and if you don't tell it, the kidnapper can't open it. 4. technology is expensive.

Aquí difiero ligeramente, ya que he experimentado accesos no autorizados a mi información en dispositivos con seguridad biométrica, específicamente facial y de voz. Sin embargo, no he experimentado ningún acceso no autorizado en dispositivos que utilizan huellas dactilares. Tengo un hermano menor, con una diferencia de edad de 15 años, y él ha logrado acceder a mis dispositivos mediante la identificación por voz y facial. Aunque nuestras voces son diferentes en persona y hay parecido físico, él ha podido acceder a mis equipos sin problemas desde hace 10 años. Pensé que con las mejoras tecnológicas a lo largo de los años, esto ya no sería posible. Sin embargo, hace unos días hicimos una prueba y él logró entrar a mis dispositivos.

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is by far gaining traction. Of course Single-sign-on (SSO) and Certificate based authentication methodologies are time-tested. Others include Behavioral authentication, Passwordless authentication, Decentralized authentication, Invisible MFA, Continuous authentication, Provisioning, Adaptive Authentication

The most critical aspect to doing biometric authentication security is by requiring the storage to be decentralized. This way, there is no central repository that can be compromised which hackers can then use to access accounts protected by those biometrics. This is critical because unlike passwords, biometrics are not easy to change. Standards like FIDO leverage on device biometrics with a tokenized credential that makes it much more practical to use biometric authentication at scale across many platforms.

Newest authentication technologies and tools for data security include: 1. Passwordless Authentication: Using biometrics, tokens, or mobile apps for login. 2. Zero Trust Security: Verifying identity continuously, not just at login. 3. Behavioral Analytics: Analyzing user behavior for anomalies. 4. FIDO2: Standard for secure and easy-to-use authentication. 5. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Combining multiple authentication methods. 6. Blockchain-Based Authentication: Enhanced security and transparency. 7. AI and Machine Learning: Detecting and preventing fraud proactively. Adopting these tools and technologies can strengthen data security.

La Autenticación Multifactor (AMF) es una excelente manera de mejorar la seguridad, ya que requiere múltiples formas de verificación. Esto dificulta que los atacantes comprometan todos los factores a la vez. Sin embargo, como se menciona, también puede aumentar la complejidad y el costo, y potencialmente causar frustración al usuario. por lo tanto considero concientizar al usuario final sobre la seguridad de la información, ya que al saber que es importante aplicar estas opciones de seguridad quizá se le haga menos tedioso y por convicción lo realice sin problema

MFA is great, but it’s not a silver bullet. Email, OTP, and call back options are phishable. Push notification suffers from a condition called push fatigue. Anyone serious about secure authentication should be cautious of these options. FIDO2 and PKI are more secure options, but require hardware such as Yubikeys or smart cards. IDaaS vendors may have their own MFA authenticators as well, such as FastPass which uses biometrics. Utilizing resources such as NIST guidance or consulting someone that has experience implement a solution can be invaluable in successful implantation. This process is finding the balance of properly securing the data while also providing an easy solution for the end user.

MFA is another piece of authentication mechanism widely used by many Financial, Communication and even retail for their online customers. Personally feel this protects keeps one alerted if any one does any login attempts. Nikhil was thinking about you when writing this.. good old days at our previous project.

Risk Based Authentication is the new trend in cyber security when it comes to MFA. AI and UBA can assume if that's you or not from your normal access footprint. MFA alone is not enough anymore.

MFA is a powerful tool that can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorised access to your accounts and data. However, MFA also have some drawbacks, such as increased complexity, cost, and user frustration. From experience the user frustration part is the most challenging component to deal with, especially in scenarios where use of technology is limited by by design and necessity. In short know your environment before embarking on MFA and have contingencies in place.

Estoy seguro de que ayuda en el análisis de accesos a detectar algo inusual y prevenir un acceso no autorizado Todos los factores para implementar una mejor seguridad son importantes, y si se combinan con otros estoy seguro que se dificultara mucho más los accesos no autorizados

In my experience, Behavioral authentication offers an innovative approach to identity verification. It observes your unique patterns, providing continuous and unobtrusive security. However, addressing false positives, ethical concerns, and ensuring transparent data handling and accuracy is paramount. Balancing the benefits with these considerations is essential for its effective implementation.

Behavioral authentication offers a unique blend of security and user experience by passively analyzing user interactions. It excels in providing continuous, non-intrusive verification, a contrast to static authentication methods. However, it raises significant privacy and ethical concerns, as behavioral data can be deeply personal. Ensuring fairness and avoiding bias in these algorithms is as crucial as their technical accuracy. As behavioral authentication matures, its growing accuracy and adaptability could make it an integral part of future security systems, but this must be paralleled by stringent ethical and privacy standards.

La autenticación sin contraseña tiene el potencial de mejorar significativamente la seguridad y la experiencia del usuario. Al eliminar las contraseñas, se reducen los riesgos asociados con el robo de contraseñas y el olvido de las mismas. Sin embargo, como se menciona, hay desafíos que deben abordarse, como la compatibilidad con sistemas existentes y la disponibilidad constante de métodos de autenticación sin contraseña. Además, es crucial tener un proceso de recuperación robusto y fácil de usar en caso de que los usuarios no puedan autenticarse por alguna razón. En general, creo que la autenticación sin contraseña es un paso adelante en la dirección correcta para mejorar la seguridad y la comodidad del usuario.

What you know, what you have and what you are, are the traditional authentication methods ... Where you are is the newer method to authenticate based on your location.

La autenticación passwordless es hoy una realidad ya que con el ecosistema tecnológico vigente, especialmente a nivel de smartphones y tablets en donde más del 95% permite utilizar passwordless basado en FIDO2, hace posible avanzar en un mecanismo resistente a ataques de ingeniería social y los diversos tipos de phishing actuales (Smishing, qrishing, entre otros) o bien evitar la captura de credenciales desde computadores afectados con Ransomware y/o keyloggers Todo esto aumenta la confianza digital de los clientes o usuarios en marcas, servicios y empresas

Passkeys are an interesting way to solve most common password issues. You do not need to remember arbitrary combinations of characters and have a different for everything you use. They have an improved user and security experience. It allows companies to build secure products without compromising between UX and security. Passkeys are resistant to the threats of phishing, credential stuffing, and other remote attacks.

In my experience, Passwordless authentication represents a significant leap in data security and user convenience. By eliminating passwords, it mitigates the risks of breaches and streamlines the authentication process. However, addressing compatibility, availability, and recovery challenges is crucial to ensure a seamless transition to this innovative method while maintaining robust security.

In my experience, Decentralized authentication, leveraging blockchain and distributed ledgers, is a game-changer in data security. It eliminates centralized vulnerabilities, granting users control over their data. However, addressing scalability, usability, and interoperability challenges is key to fully realizing the potential of this secure and empowering authentication method.

With the exception of the passwordless and decentralized authentication methods, none of the authentication technologies mentioned in this article are very recent.

Decentralized authentication is critical in order to ensure that the organizations and products that handle our identities are doing so in a responsible manner. The blockchain aspect is important where we need immutability in identity capabilities which is more important for some industries such as healthcare and financial services than others. However, any solutions in this space must be flexible to support various levels of privacy that may be needed due to regulatory or internal corporate requirements.

Businesses are at a higher risk of compromise if you don't deploy Strong Authentication using Phishing Resistant Authentication solutions like FIDO2 with Hardware Security Keys or Software based Passkeys. Both these solutions are highly effective.

We must consider identity verification and how it is increasingly a vector of attack for hackers. As authentication controls improve, hackers will continue to target the credential provisioning process more as the next weak point.

Well, there are quite a few authentication methods to discuss, but I'll highlight three that I particularly like. First, there's hardware-based authentication, using tokens, security keys, and TPMs for strong security. Next, combining risk-based with continuous authentication provides an extra layer of security by looking at the context of authentication requests and monitoring user behavior and device data in real-time to spot anomalies. Lastly, my personal favorite is quantum-safe authentication, which serves as a resilient, future-proof solution in the face of evolving threats posed by quantum computing, mitigating cryptographic vulnerabilities and ensuring long-term security.

All of the types mentioned are great. Some are better then others, however it's best to have multiple types of authentication and at different layers. One that I like the most, unfortunately most companies just haven't adopted yet, is the zero-trust model. I understand it may not be necessary at all companies out there (cost benefit ratio). Having and/or adopting the zero trust model would protect both inside and outside a network. It continually verifies the trustworthiness of users and devices before granting access.

The authentication landscape is multifaceted, and no single technology can address all security needs. A combination of various methods, aligned with specific contexts and risks, is crucial. The integration of AI and machine learning promises more adaptive and intelligent systems but must be balanced with user experience and ethical data use. As these technologies evolve, continuous reassessment of risks, benefits, and ethical implications is imperative to ensure a secure, user-centric digital environment.