This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/171/23
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 May 2005 in Case T-359/02 Chum Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark STAR TV — Opposition of the owner of the international figurative mark STAR TV — Refusal to register)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 May 2005 in Case T-359/02 Chum Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark STAR TV — Opposition of the owner of the international figurative mark STAR TV — Refusal to register)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 May 2005 in Case T-359/02 Chum Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark STAR TV — Opposition of the owner of the international figurative mark STAR TV — Refusal to register)
OB C 171, 9.7.2005, p. 14–14
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.7.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/14 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 4 May 2005
in Case T-359/02 Chum Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Word mark STAR TV - Opposition of the owner of the international figurative mark STAR TV - Refusal to register)
(2005/C 171/23)
Language of the case: English
In Case T-359/02: Chum Ltd, established in Toronto (Canada), represented by M.J. Gilbert, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: P. Bullock and S. Laitinen), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM having been Star TV AG, established in Schlieren (Switzerland) — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 September 2002 (Case R 1146/2000-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Chum Ltd and Star TV AG — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 4 May 2005, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |