This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FB0098
Case F-98/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Cervelli v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Request for review — Material new facts — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-98/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Cervelli v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Request for review — Material new facts — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-98/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Cervelli v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Request for review — Material new facts — Action manifestly inadmissible)
OJ C 362, 10.12.2011, p. 24–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 12/09/2011
- Date lodged:
- 07/10/2010
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Annulment requested by 62011TN0622
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
10.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 362/24 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Cervelli v Commission
(Case F-98/10) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Request for review - Material new facts - Action manifestly inadmissible)
2011/C 362/42
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Francesca Cervelli (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier and M. Arias Díaz, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Ms Cervelli is ordered to bear all the costs. |
(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2011, p. 42.
