This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005TB0023
Case T-23/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Gippini Fournier v Commission (Action for annulment — Action for damages — Staff case — Promotion — Award of priority points — Act not capable of being appealed — Preparatory acts — Inadmissibility)
Case T-23/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Gippini Fournier v Commission (Action for annulment — Action for damages — Staff case — Promotion — Award of priority points — Act not capable of being appealed — Preparatory acts — Inadmissibility)
Case T-23/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Gippini Fournier v Commission (Action for annulment — Action for damages — Staff case — Promotion — Award of priority points — Act not capable of being appealed — Preparatory acts — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 313, 6.12.2008, p. 33–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.12.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 313/33 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Gippini Fournier v Commission
(Case T-23/05) (1)
(Action for annulment - Action for damages - Staff case - Promotion - Award of priority points - Act not capable of being appealed - Preparatory acts - Inadmissibility)
(2008/C 313/60)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Éric Gippini Fournier (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Theissen and, subsequently, by F. Ruggeri Laderchi, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents, and D. Waelbroek, lawyer)
Re:
First, annulment of the Commission decisions not to award the applicant any priority points under the 2003 promotion procedure; to reject his appeal to the Promotions Committee seeking the award of priority points of any description; and to refuse to award priority points for work in the interest of the institution and, second, a claim for damages.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |