This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0452
Case T-452/09 P: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Taking account of the professional experience of the person concerned — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-452/09 P: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Taking account of the professional experience of the person concerned — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-452/09 P: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Taking account of the professional experience of the person concerned — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons)
OJ C 238, 13.8.2011, p. 16–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 238/16 |
Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Rosenbaum v Commission
(Case T-452/09 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Taking account of the professional experience of the person concerned - Article 31 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons)
2011/C 238/27
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Eckehard Rosenbaum (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and E. Eggers, Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Zieléskiewicz and M. Bauer, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) in Case F-9/08 Rosenbaum v Commission, judgment of 10 September 2009, not published in the ECR, asking for that judgment to be set aside.
Operative part of the order
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal. |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Eckehard Rosenbaum to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings. |
|
3. |
Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |