This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0010
Case T-10/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2011 — Birkhoff v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Refusal to extend payment of the allowance)
Case T-10/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2011 — Birkhoff v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Refusal to extend payment of the allowance)
Case T-10/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2011 — Birkhoff v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Refusal to extend payment of the allowance)
OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 51–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/51 |
Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2011 — Birkhoff v Commission
(Case T-10/11 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood - Refusal to extend payment of the allowance)
(2012/C 25/98)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Gerhard Birkhoff (Weitnau, Germany) (represented by: C. Inzillo, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggars, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 October 2010 in Case F-60/09 Birkhoff v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 October 2010 in Case F-60/09 Birkhoff v Commission (not yet published in the ECR); |
|
2. |
Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
|
3. |
Orders that the costs be reserved. |