This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FA0036
Case F-36/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Non-extension of employment contract — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Conflict of interest — Relationship of trust — Article 12b of the Staff Regulations — Outside activity — Presumption of innocence)
Case F-36/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Non-extension of employment contract — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Conflict of interest — Relationship of trust — Article 12b of the Staff Regulations — Outside activity — Presumption of innocence)
Case F-36/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Non-extension of employment contract — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Conflict of interest — Relationship of trust — Article 12b of the Staff Regulations — Outside activity — Presumption of innocence)
OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.5.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/27 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission
(Case F-36/11) (1)
(Civil service - Contract staff - Non-extension of employment contract - Article 11a of the Staff Regulations - Conflict of interest - Relationship of trust - Article 12b of the Staff Regulations - Outside activity - Presumption of innocence)
(2012/C 138/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: BD (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision not to extend the applicant’s contract beyond its end date and, hence, for reinstating the applicant in his previous functions with effect from 1 November 2010.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders BD to bear his own costs and the Commission’s costs. |