Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2012:138:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 138, 12 May 2012


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.138.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 138

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 55
12 May 2012


Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 138/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 133, 5.5.2012

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2012/C 138/02

Case C-59/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), lodged on 6 February 2012 — BKK Mobil Oil, a body governed by public law v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V.

2

2012/C 138/03

Case C-82/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain) lodged on 16 February 2012 — Transportes Jordi Besora, S.L. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC) and Generalitat de Catalunya

2

2012/C 138/04

Case C-86/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Adzo Domenyo Alopka, Jarel Mondoulou, Eja Mondoulou v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration

3

2012/C 138/05

Case C-87/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Kreshnik Ymerag, Kasim Ymeraga, Afijete Ymeraga-Tafarshiku, Kushtrim Ymeraga, Labinot Ymeraga v Minister for Labour, Employment and Immigration

3

2012/C 138/06

Case C-96/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 22 February 2012 — Domingos Freitas and Maria Adília Monteiro Pinto v Companhia de Seguros Allianz Portugal SA

4

2012/C 138/07

Case C-99/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 24 February 2012 — Eurofit SA v Bureau d’intervention et de restitution belge (BIRB)

4

2012/C 138/08

Case C-104/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 29 February 2012 — Finanzamt Köln-Nord v Wolfram Becker

5

2012/C 138/09

Case C-114/12: Action brought on 1 March 2012 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

5

2012/C 138/10

Case C-115/12 P: Appeal brought on 5 March 2012 by the French Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-488/10 France v Commission

6

2012/C 138/11

Case C-116/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Trimeles Protodikeio Serron (Greece) lodged on 5 March 2012 — Ioannis Khristodoulou, Nikolaos Khristodoulou, AFI N. Khristodoulou SA v Greek State

7

2012/C 138/12

Case C-132/12 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2012 by Stichting Woonpunt and Others against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-203/10 Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission

7

2012/C 138/13

Case C-133/12 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2012 by Stichting Woonlinie and Others against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-202/10 Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission

8

2012/C 138/14

Case C-134/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 12 March 2012 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members — public officials with a special status — police serving with the IPJ Tulcea) v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Tulcea

8

2012/C 138/15

Case C-145/12 P: Appeal brought on 26 March 2012 by Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 January 2012 in Case T-407/09 Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH v European Commission

9

2012/C 138/16

Case C-148/12: Action brought on 26 March 2012 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

10

 

General Court

2012/C 138/17

Case T-243/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poland v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC)

11

2012/C 138/18

Case T-247/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Slovakia v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted on account of the accession of new Member States — Act of Accession of 2003 — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC)

11

2012/C 138/19

Case T-248/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Czech Republic v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted due to the accession of new Member States — Act of Accession of 2003 — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary legislation — Decision 2007/361/EC)

12

2012/C 138/20

Case T-262/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Lithuania v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC)

12

2012/C 138/21

Case T-336/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Spanish markets for access to broadband internet — Decision declaring an infringement of Article 82 EC — Price-fixing — Margin squeeze — Definition of the markets — Dominant position — Abuse — Calculation of the margin squeeze — Effects of the abuse — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Subsidiarity — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Sincere cooperation — Principle of sound administration — Fines)

13

2012/C 138/22

Case T-398/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Spain v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Spanish broadband internet access markets — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Price-fixing — Margin squeeze — Sincere cooperation — Ultra vires application of Article 82 EC — Legal certainty — Protection of legitimate expectations)

13

2012/C 138/23

Case T-214/08: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Rehbein v OHIM — Dias Martinho (OUTBURST) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark OUTBURST — Earlier national word mark OUTBURST — Genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

14

2012/C 138/24

Case T-296/08: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung v Commission (Aid granted under the INTI programme — Determination of the amount to be paid to the beneficiary — Errors of assessment)

14

2012/C 138/25

Case T-41/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Hipp v OHIM — Nestlé (Bebio) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Bebio — Earlier Community word mark and international word mark BEBA — Partial refusal of registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

14

2012/C 138/26

Case T-123/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Ryanair v European Commission (State aid — Loan granted to an airline company and capable of being counted as own capital — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Sale of assets of an airline company — Decision finding no aid at the conclusion of the preliminary examination phase — Actions for annulment — Locus standi — Interested party — Admissibility — Serious difficulties — Jurisdiction — Duty to state reasons)

15

2012/C 138/27

Case T-417/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poslovni Sistem Mercator v OHIM — Mercator Multihull (MERCATOR STUDIOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MERCATOR STUDIOS — Earlier national and international figurative marks Mercator and Mercator Slovenska košarica — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No injury to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

15

2012/C 138/28

Case T-111/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Portugal v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Operational Programme seeking modernisation of the economic fabric in Portugal — Absence of precise and verifiable binding objectives — Legitimate expectations)

16

2012/C 138/29

Case T-190/10: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Egan and Hackett v Parliament (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Registers of assistants to former members of the European Parliament — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001)

16

2012/C 138/30

Case T-369/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — You-Q BV v OHIM — Apple Corps (BEATLE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BEATLE — Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks BEATLES and THE BEATLES — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation of the earlier marks)

16

2012/C 138/31

Case T-547/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Omya v OHIM — Alpha Calcit (CALCIMATT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CALCIMATT — Prior Community word mark CALCILAN — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Refusal of registration)

17

2012/C 138/32

Case T-242/11: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Kaltenbach & Voigt v OHIM (3D eXam) (Community trade mark — International registration — Request for territorial extension of protection — Figurative mark 3D eXam — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character and lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

17

2012/C 138/33

Case T-453/10: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2012 — Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v Commission (Action for annulment — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure incurred by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Expenditure excluded from European Union financing — Devolved administration — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)

17

2012/C 138/34

Case T-106/12: Action brought on 29 February 2012 — Cytochroma Development v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN)

18

2012/C 138/35

Case T-117/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ANKO v Commission

18

2012/C 138/36

Case T-118/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ANKO v Commission

19

2012/C 138/37

Case T-125/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission

19

 

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2012/C 138/38

Case F-56/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Strobl v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading under the new, less favourable rules — Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of equality — Age discrimination)

21

2012/C 138/39

Case F-70/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Mische v Commission (Civil service — Appointment — Successful candidate in a competition published before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations but finalised afterwards — Grading under new, less favourable rules)

21

2012/C 138/40

Case F-93/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Mische v Parliament (Civil service — Appointment — Recruitment and simultaneous transfer to another institution — Grading under new, less favourable rules — Admissibility of the action — Interest in bringing an action — Action out of time)

22

2012/C 138/41

Case F-18/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2011 — Mohamed Merhzaoui v Council of the European Union (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Classification in grade — Local staff appointed as officials — Article 10 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Article 3 of the annex to the CEOS — Promotion exercise for 2008 — Consideration of comparative merits of officials attached to the career stream AST — Procedure based on staff reports 2005/2006 — Criterion of the level of responsibilities exercised)

22

2012/C 138/42

Case F-20/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2011 — Juvyns v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2008 promotion procedure — Comparative examination of merit — Procedure based on 2005/2006 annual staff reports — Criterion of the level of responsibilities exercised)

22

2012/C 138/43

Case F-19/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — Marsili v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Evaluation of the oral test — Composition of the selection board)

23

2012/C 138/44

Case F-27/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 March 2011 — Begue and Others v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Staff entitled to an allowance for regular stand-by duty — Article 55 and Article 56b of the Staff Regulations — Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 495/77)

23

2012/C 138/45

Case F-28/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 — VE (*1) v Commission (Staff cases — Contractual agents — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions laid down in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Habitual residence prior to taking up duties)

23

2012/C 138/46

Case F-72/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 29(1)(a) and (b) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Statement of reasons)

24

2012/C 138/47

Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof)

24

2012/C 138/48

Case F-80/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — AJ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Articles 43 and 45 of the Staff Regulations — Appraisal report — Manifest error of assessment — Statement of reasons)

24

2012/C 138/49

Case F-81/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2011 — Praskevicius v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Merit points — Consideration of comparative merits — Statement of reasons)

25

2012/C 138/50

Case F-89/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Bovagnet v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Education costs — Definition)

25

2012/C 138/51

Case F-100/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2012 — AM v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Insurance against accidents and occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to recognise the accidental cause of a stroke — Medical committee — Principle of collegiality)

25

2012/C 138/52

Case F-113/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2012 — AT v EACEA (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — Evaluation report — Definitive nature — Time-limit for bringing an action — Out of time — Early termination of fixed-term employment contract on ground of incompetence — Review by the courts — Manifest error of assessment)

26

2012/C 138/53

Case F-114/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Bowles, Larue and Whitehead v ECB (Staff case — Staff of the ECB — General adjustment to salaries — Method of calculation — Provisional data — Economic and financial crisis — Special circumstances — Act adversely affecting an official — Pay slip — Provisional act)

26

2012/C 138/54

Case F-119/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 November 2011 — Di Tullio v Commission (Civil service — Temporary staff — Leave for national service — Article 18 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Professional soldier — Completion of a period of territorial command — Refusal)

26

2012/C 138/55

Case F-121/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Michael Heath v ECB (Civil Service — ECB Staff — Pension scheme — Pension plan — Annual pension increase — Harmonised index of consumer prices — Opinion of pension plan actuary — Consultation of staff committee — Consultation of oversight committee — Right to negotiate by collective agreement)

27

2012/C 138/56

Case F-123/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 February 2012 — Bancale and Buccheri v Commission (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Internal competitions — Conditions for admission — Professional experience acquired after obtaining the diploma — Diploma — Qualifications obtained before obtaining the diploma — Equivalence)

27

2012/C 138/57

Case F-36/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Non-extension of employment contract — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Conflict of interest — Relationship of trust — Article 12b of the Staff Regulations — Outside activity — Presumption of innocence)

27

2012/C 138/58

Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points)

28

2012/C 138/59

Case F-21/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

28

2012/C 138/60

Case F-32/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Wilk v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Reimbursement of expenses — Installation allowance — Installation with family at the place of employment — Recovery of undue payments — Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

28

2012/C 138/61

Case F-46/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — AD v Commission (No need to adjudicate)

29

2012/C 138/62

Case F-57/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Pedeferri and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Inadmissibility — Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure)

29

2012/C 138/63

Case F-59/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice (Civil Service — Preliminary issues — Plea of inadmissibility — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility)

29

2012/C 138/64

Case F-67/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages relating to the taxation of costs — Inadmissibility)

30

2012/C 138/65

Case F-69/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in that case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

30

2012/C 138/66

Case F-107/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — AP v Court of Justice (Civil service — Delay — Manifest inadmissibility)

30

2012/C 138/67

Case F-108/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 July 2011 — Filice and others v Court of Justice (Civil service — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other EU staff — No need to adjudicate)

30

2012/C 138/68

Case F-18/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Zaffino v Commission (Civil service — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifestly inadmissible — Failure to comply with the preliminary procedure)

31

2012/C 138/69

Case F-19/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Galvan v Commission (Civil Service — Person claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifest inadmissibility — Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure)

31

2012/C 138/70

Case F-20/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Bracalente v Commission (Civil service — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifestly inadmissible — Failure to comply with preliminary procedure)

31

2012/C 138/71

Case F-21/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Pirri v Commission (Civil Service — Person claiming the status of official or other servant of the European Union — Action — Manifest inadmissibility — failure to observe the pre-contentious procedure)

31

2012/C 138/72

Case F-85/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2011 — Wendelboe v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Refusal to promote an official — Transfer between institutions during the promotion year in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin — Complaint — Delay — Inadmissibility)

32

2012/C 138/73

Case F-12/12: Action brought on 27 January 2012 — ZZ v Commission

32

2012/C 138/74

Case F-13/12: Action brought on 3 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission

32

2012/C 138/75

Case F-14/12: Action brought on 4 February 2012 — ZZ v European Court of Auditors

33

2012/C 138/76

Case F-16/12: Action brought on 10 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission

33

2012/C 138/77

Case F-17/12: Action brought on 8 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission

33

2012/C 138/78

Case F-18/12: Action brought on 9 February 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

34

2012/C 138/79

Case F-19/12: Action brought on 13 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission

34

2012/C 138/80

Case F-20/12: Action brought on 15 February 2012 — ZZ v EIGE

35

2012/C 138/81

Case F-22/12: Action brought on 17th February 2012 — ZZ v Commission and CEPOL

35

2012/C 138/82

Case F-23/12: Action brought on 20 February 2012 — ZZ and Others v Commission

35

2012/C 138/83

Case F-24/12: Action brought on 27 February 2012 — ZZ v Parliament

36

2012/C 138/84

Case F-25/12: Action brought on 21 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission

36

2012/C 138/85

Case F-30/12: Action brought on 5 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission

36

2012/C 138/86

Case F-32/12: Action brought on 7 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission

36

2012/C 138/87

Case F-35/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ZZ v BEREC

37

2012/C 138/88

Case F-38/12: Action brought on 19th March 2012 — ZZ v FRA

37

2012/C 138/89

Case F-39/12: Action brought on 19 March 2012 — ZZ v Court of Auditors

38

2012/C 138/90

Case F-41/12: Action brought on 21 March 2012 — ZZ v Parliament

38

2012/C 138/91

Case F-138/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 September 2011 — Van Arum v Parliament

39

2012/C 138/92

Case F-76/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 April 2011 — Behmer v Parliament

39

2012/C 138/93

Case F-24/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 February 2012 — Wagner-Leclercq v Council

39

2012/C 138/94

Case F-18/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 February 2011 — Capidis v Commission

39

2012/C 138/95

Case F-24/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 March 2011 — Kaskarelis v Commission

39

2012/C 138/96

Case F-37/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 May 2011 — Stratakis v Commission

39

2012/C 138/97

Case F-95/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB

39

2012/C 138/98

Case F-103/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 July 2011 — Jaeger v Eurofound

39

2012/C 138/99

Case F-105/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB

40

2012/C 138/100

Case F-127/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB

40

2012/C 138/101

Case F-5/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v Commission

40

2012/C 138/102

Case F-15/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v SEAE

40

2012/C 138/103

Case F-26/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 November 2011 — AC v Council

40

2012/C 138/104

Case F-30/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 October 2011 — Torijano Montero v Council

40

2012/C 138/105

Case F-35/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 December 2011 — Svitana v Parliament

40

2012/C 138/106

Case F-68/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 January 2012 — Schreiber v Commission

40


(*1)Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

 


EN

 

Top
  翻译: