This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CN0593
Case C-593/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 19 December 2014 — Masco Denmark ApS and Damixa ApS v Skatteministeriet
Case C-593/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 19 December 2014 — Masco Denmark ApS and Damixa ApS v Skatteministeriet
Case C-593/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 19 December 2014 — Masco Denmark ApS and Damixa ApS v Skatteministeriet
OJ C 73, 2.3.2015, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
2.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 73/17 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 19 December 2014 — Masco Denmark ApS and Damixa ApS v Skatteministeriet
(Case C-593/14)
(2015/C 073/23)
Language of the case: Danish
Referring court
Vestre Landsret
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Masco Denmark ApS and Damixa ApS
Defendant: Skatteministeriet
Question referred
‘Does Article 43 EC, read in conjunction with Article 48 EC (now Article 49 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 54 TFEU), preclude a Member State from not allowing a resident company a tax exemption for interest income where an affiliated company within the same group established in another Member State is not entitled to a tax deduction for the corresponding interest expenditure as a result of rules (as in the present case) in the relevant Member State on interest deduction limitation in cases of thin capitalisation, where the Member State allows a resident company a tax exemption for interest income in cases where an affiliated company within the same group in that same Member State is not allowed a tax deduction for the corresponding interest expenditure as a result of national rules (as in the present case) on interest deduction limitation in cases of thin capitalisation?’