This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014FB0104
Case F-104/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 30 November 2015 — O’Riain v Commission (Civil service — Competitions — Competition notice EPSO/AD/241/12 — Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list — Principle of equal treatment of candidates — Impartiality of the selection board — Action manifestly unfounded)
Case F-104/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 30 November 2015 — O’Riain v Commission (Civil service — Competitions — Competition notice EPSO/AD/241/12 — Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list — Principle of equal treatment of candidates — Impartiality of the selection board — Action manifestly unfounded)
Case F-104/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 30 November 2015 — O’Riain v Commission (Civil service — Competitions — Competition notice EPSO/AD/241/12 — Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list — Principle of equal treatment of candidates — Impartiality of the selection board — Action manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 27, 25.1.2016, p. 77–77
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 27/77 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 30 November 2015 — O’Riain v Commission
(Case F-104/14) (1)
((Civil service - Competitions - Competition notice EPSO/AD/241/12 - Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list - Principle of equal treatment of candidates - Impartiality of the selection board - Action manifestly unfounded))
(2016/C 027/98)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Donncha O’Riain (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for Competition EPSO/AD/241/12-GA.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
Mr O’Riain shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
(1) OJ C 7 of 12/1/2015, p. 52.