This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TB0213
Case T-213/15: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — toom Baumarkt (Super-Samstag) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-213/15: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — toom Baumarkt (Super-Samstag) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-213/15: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — toom Baumarkt (Super-Samstag) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 38, 1.2.2016, p. 60–61
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 38/60 |
Order of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — toom Baumarkt (Super-Samstag)
(Case T-213/15) (1)
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 038/81)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter and A.C. Berger, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: H.P. Kunz, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: toom Baumarkt GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and J. Rosenhäger, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 February 2015 (Case R 657/2014-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between toom Baumarkt GmbH and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs. |