This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0456
Case T-456/17: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-456/17: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-456/17: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 259, 23.7.2018, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-456/17: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS)
(Case T-456/17) ( 1 )
‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’
2018/C 259/50Language of the case: EnglishParties
Applicant: Victor Lupu (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: P. Acsinte, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ibryam Dzhihangir (Silistra, Bulgaria) (represented by: C.-R. Romiţan, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2017 (Case R 516/2011-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Lupu and Mr Dzhihangir.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The plea of inadmissibility is joined to the main proceedings. |
|
2. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
3. |
Mr Victor Lupu shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
|
4. |
Mr Ibryam Dzhihangir shall bear his own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.