This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0646
Case T-646/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Simpson v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Upgrade — Classification in grade — Decision not to award the applicant grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition — Dismissal of the action at first instance after referral back by the General Court — Composition of the panel of judges which adopted the order at first instance — Procedure for appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal — Tribunal established by law — Principle of the right to a judge assigned by law)
Case T-646/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Simpson v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Upgrade — Classification in grade — Decision not to award the applicant grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition — Dismissal of the action at first instance after referral back by the General Court — Composition of the panel of judges which adopted the order at first instance — Procedure for appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal — Tribunal established by law — Principle of the right to a judge assigned by law)
Case T-646/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Simpson v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Upgrade — Classification in grade — Decision not to award the applicant grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition — Dismissal of the action at first instance after referral back by the General Court — Composition of the panel of judges which adopted the order at first instance — Procedure for appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal — Tribunal established by law — Principle of the right to a judge assigned by law)
OJ C 364, 8.10.2018, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.10.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 364/11 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Simpson v Council
(Case T-646/16 P) (1)
((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Upgrade - Classification in grade - Decision not to award the applicant grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition - Dismissal of the action at first instance after referral back by the General Court - Composition of the panel of judges which adopted the order at first instance - Procedure for appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal - Tribunal established by law - Principle of the right to a judge assigned by law))
(2018/C 364/10)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Erik Simpson (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 June 2016, Simpson v Council, (F-142/11 RENV, EU:F:2016:136), and seeking to have that order set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Sets aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 June 2016, Simpson v Council (F-142/11 RENV); |
|
2. |
Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which ruled on the present appeal; |
|
3. |
Reserves the costs. |