This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0780
Case T-780/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Appraisal report for 2016 — Annual salary and bonus review — Refusal to convert a fixed-term employment contract into a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-780/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Appraisal report for 2016 — Annual salary and bonus review — Refusal to convert a fixed-term employment contract into a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-780/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Appraisal report for 2016 — Annual salary and bonus review — Refusal to convert a fixed-term employment contract into a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 413, 9.12.2019, p. 44–45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.12.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 413/44 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB
(Case T-780/17) (1)
(Civil service - ECB staff - Appraisal report for 2016 - Annual salary and bonus review - Refusal to convert a fixed-term employment contract into a contract for an indefinite period - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)
(2019/C 413/52)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: US (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and M. Rötting, acting as Agents, and B. Wagenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2016 and the decision regarding the annual salary and bonus review for 2016 and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of those measures.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
|
2. |
Orders US to pay the costs. |