This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0321
Case T-321/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — Maternus v EUIPO– adp Gauselmann (Jokers WILD Casino) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark Jokers WILD Casino — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-321/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — Maternus v EUIPO– adp Gauselmann (Jokers WILD Casino) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark Jokers WILD Casino — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-321/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — Maternus v EUIPO– adp Gauselmann (Jokers WILD Casino) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark Jokers WILD Casino — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)
OJ C 175, 25.5.2020, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.5.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 175/20 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — Maternus v EUIPO– adp Gauselmann (Jokers WILD Casino)
(Case T-321/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Jokers WILD Casino - Obligation to state reasons - First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No genuine use of the trade mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2020/C 175/25)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Maternus GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Zöbisch and R. Drozdz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer, A. Söder and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: K. Mandel and K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2019 (Case R 803/2018-1), relating to revocation proceedings between adp Gauselmann and Maternus.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Maternus GmbH to pay the costs. |