This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0368
Case T-368/20: Action brought on 12 June 2020 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)
Case T-368/20: Action brought on 12 June 2020 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)
Case T-368/20: Action brought on 12 June 2020 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)
OJ C 255, 3.8.2020, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 255/32 |
Action brought on 12 June 2020 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)
(Case T-368/20)
(2020/C 255/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Smiley Miley, Inc. (Nashville, Tennessee, United States) (represented by: J. Devaureix, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Trademarks Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark MILEY CYRUS — Application for registration No 12 807 111
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 in Case R 2520/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
admit the notice of claim, with all documents annexed and the correspondent copies; |
|
— |
admit all the evidence attached to the writ of notice of claim; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and eventually the intervener to bear the costs of these proceedings. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |