This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0515
Case T-515/20: Action brought on 17 August 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — Caterpillar (SPEEDCAT)
Case T-515/20: Action brought on 17 August 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — Caterpillar (SPEEDCAT)
Case T-515/20: Action brought on 17 August 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — Caterpillar (SPEEDCAT)
OJ C 329, 5.10.2020, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.10.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 329/24 |
Action brought on 17 August 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — Caterpillar (SPEEDCAT)
(Case T-515/20)
(2020/C 329/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caterpillar Inc. (Peoria, Illinois, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SPEEDCAT — Application for registration No 16 703 225
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2020 in Case R 1016/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |