This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TB0080
Case T-80/20: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — IM v EIB and EIF (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Post of Director-General of the EIF — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Appointment of another candidate — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Case T-80/20: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — IM v EIB and EIF (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Post of Director-General of the EIF — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Appointment of another candidate — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Case T-80/20: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — IM v EIB and EIF (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Post of Director-General of the EIF — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Appointment of another candidate — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 62, 22.2.2021, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.2.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 62/33 |
Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — IM v EIB and EIF
(Case T-80/20) (1)
(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Post of Director-General of the EIF - Rejection of the applicant’s candidature - Appointment of another candidate - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 62/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: IM (represented by: D. Giabbani, lawyer)
Defendants: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers), European Investment Fund (represented by: N. Panayotopoulos and F. Dascalescu, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EIF of 11 December 2019 appointing a new Director-General of the EIF.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
IM shall pay the costs. |