This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0232
Case T-232/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark BIOVÈNE — Earlier EU word mark BIORENE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-232/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark BIOVÈNE — Earlier EU word mark BIORENE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-232/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark BIOVÈNE — Earlier EU word mark BIORENE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 329, 16.8.2021, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.8.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 329/23 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE)
(Case T-232/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark BIOVÈNE - Earlier EU word mark BIORENE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 329/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Biovene Cosmetics, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Estella Garbayo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Eugène Perma France (Saint-Denis, France) (represented by: S. Havard Duclos, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2020 (Case R 739/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Eugène Perma France and Biovene Cosmetics.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Biovene Cosmetics, SL to pay the costs. |