This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0357
Case T-357/21: Action brought on 25 June 2021 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal)
Case T-357/21: Action brought on 25 June 2021 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal)
Case T-357/21: Action brought on 25 June 2021 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal)
OJ C 329, 16.8.2021, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.8.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 329/38 |
Action brought on 25 June 2021 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal)
(Case T-357/21)
(2021/C 329/51)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL (Arnedo, Spain) (represented by: M. Escudero Pérez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal — Application for registration No 17 880 571
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2021 in Case R 2991/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |