Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CN0520

Case C-520/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Silistra (Bulgaria) lodged on 16 October 2020 — DB, LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsiya na Ministerstvoto na vatreshnite raboti

OJ C 433, 14.12.2020, p. 40–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.12.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/40


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Silistra (Bulgaria) lodged on 16 October 2020 — DB, LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsiya na Ministerstvoto na vatreshnite raboti

(Case C-520/20)

(2020/C 433/49)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Silistra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: DB, LY

Defendant: Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsiya na Ministerstvoto na vatreshnite raboti

Question referred

Must Article 39 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), and in particular Article 39(3) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that it allows national rules and administrative practices under which, if the competent executing authority has valid reason to conclude that the alert entered in the SIS is not covered by the objectives for which it has been registered, and in particular the objectives laid down in Article 38(1), that authority can and must refuse to execute it?


Top
  翻译: