English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Document 62016TA0433
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2021. Pometon SpA v European Commission. Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Participation in bilateral and multilateral contacts with the aim of coordinating prices throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) – ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Principle of impartiality of the European Commission – Article 48 – Presumption of innocence – Obligation to state reasons – Single and continuous infringement – Duration of the infringement – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction. Case C-440/19 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2021:214
- Defendant
- European Commission
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Jürimäe
- Type of procedure
- Appeal - unfounded,Appeal - successful,Action for annulment,Appeal - inadmissible
18/03/2021
PROCEEDINGS
- Title
- Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 8 October 2020. Pometon SpA v European Commission. Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Participation in bilateral and multilateral contacts with the aim of coordinating prices throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) – ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Principle of impartiality of the European Commission – Article 48 – Presumption of innocence – Obligation to state reasons – Single and continuous infringement – Duration of the infringement – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction. Case C-440/19 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2020:816
- Advocate General
- Hogan
08/10/2020
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019. Pometon SpA v European Commission. Competition – Agreements and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Chronologically staggered ‘hybrid’ procedure – Presumption of innocence – Principle of impartiality – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Evidence of the infringement – Single and continuous infringement – Restriction of competition by object – Duration of the infringement – Fine – Exceptional adaptation of the basic amount – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction. Case T-433/16.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2019:201
- Defendant
- European Commission
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Perillo
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - successful,Action for annulment - unfounded
- Complementary documents:
28/03/2019
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case T-433/16: Action brought on 3 August 2016 — Pometon v Commission
10/10/2016