English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Document 62021TN0372
Case T-372/21
T-372/21
General Court
Status: Closed
T-372/21
General Court
Status: Closed
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 March 2023. Sympatex Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sympathy Inside – Earlier EU word mark INSIDE. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No alteration of distinctive character. Case T-372/21.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2023:111
- Applicant
- Individual
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Kingston
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Complementary documents:
02/05/2023
- Title
- Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 March 2023. Sympatex Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office. EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sympathy Inside – Earlier EU word mark INSIDE. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No alteration of distinctive character. Case T-372/21.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:T:2023:111
- Applicant
- Individual
- Defendant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Kingston
- Type of procedure
- Action for annulment - unfounded
08/03/2023
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case T-372/21: Action brought on 1 July 2021 — Sympatex Technologies v EUIPO — Liwe Española (Sympathy Inside)
16/08/2021