This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0798
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2017.
Hanso Holding AS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark REAL — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001].
Case T-798/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2017.
Hanso Holding AS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark REAL — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001].
Case T-798/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2017 – Hanso Holding v EUIPO (REAL)
(Case T-798/16)
(EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark REAL — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001])
|
1. |
EU trade mark–Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark–Absolute grounds for refusal–Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service–Aim–Need to preserve availability (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see para. 13) |
|
2. |
EU trade mark–Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark–Absolute grounds for refusal–Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service–Meaning (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 14, 15, 30, 34) |
|
3. |
EU trade mark–Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark–Absolute grounds for refusal–Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service–Assessment of the descriptive nature of a sign–Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 16, 17) |
|
4. |
EU trade mark–Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark–Absolute grounds for refusal–Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service–Figurative mark REAL (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 27, 47) |
|
5. |
EU trade mark–Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark–Absolute grounds for refusal–Marks devoid of any distinctive character–Exception–Distinctive character acquired through use–Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(3)) (see paras 38, 39, 42-45, 49, 50) |
|
6. |
EU trade mark–Decisions of the Office–Legality–Examination by the EU judicature–Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see para. 58) |
|
7. |
EU trade mark–Decisions of the Office–Principle of equal treatment–Principle of sound administration–EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see paras 60-62) |
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 September 2016 (Case R 2405/2015-2), relating to the application for registration of the figurative sign REAL as a European Union trade mark.
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hanso Holding AS to pay the costs. |