This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TJ0227
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 June 2021.
Biovene Cosmetics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA – Earlier EU word mark BIORENE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-227/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 June 2021.
Biovene Cosmetics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA – Earlier EU word mark BIORENE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-227/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:395
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 June 2021 –
Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO – Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE BARCELONA)
(Case T‑227/20)
(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA – Earlier EU word mark BIORENE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
1. |
EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Review of the lawfulness of decisions of the Boards of Appeal – Annulment or variation for reasons appearing after judgment was delivered – Precluded (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 72(2) and 95) (see paras 27-29) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it – Precluded (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72) (see para. 35) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 40, 41, 85) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 44, 49, 53) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA and word mark BIORENE (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 50-52, 54, 55, 65-69, 73-75, 77, 80-83, 86, 87) |
6. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 60) |
7. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Objective marketing considerations to be taken into account (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 88) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2020 (Case R 1661/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Eugène Perma France and Biovene Cosmetics.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Biovene Cosmetics, SL to pay the costs. |