Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TJ0227

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 June 2021.
Biovene Cosmetics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA – Earlier EU word mark BIORENE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-227/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:395

 Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 June 2021 –
Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO – Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE BARCELONA)

(Case T‑227/20)

(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA – Earlier EU word mark BIORENE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

1. 

EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Review of the lawfulness of decisions of the Boards of Appeal – Annulment or variation for reasons appearing after judgment was delivered – Precluded

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 72(2) and 95)

(see paras 27-29)

2. 

EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it – Precluded

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72)

(see para. 35)

3. 

EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 40, 41, 85)

4. 

EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 44, 49, 53)

5. 

EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA and word mark BIORENE

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 50-52, 54, 55, 65-69, 73-75, 77, 80-83, 86, 87)

6. 

EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see para. 60)

7. 

EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Objective marketing considerations to be taken into account

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see para. 88)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2020 (Case R 1661/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Eugène Perma France and Biovene Cosmetics.

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders Biovene Cosmetics, SL to pay the costs.

Top
  翻译: