This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2003/304/07
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2003 in Case C-408/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden): Adidas-Salomon AG, formerly Adidas AG, Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd (Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(2) — Trade marks with a reputation — Protection against use of a sign in relation to identical or similar goods or services — Degree of similarity between the mark and the sign — Effect on the public — Sign viewed as an embellishment)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2003 in Case C-408/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden): Adidas-Salomon AG, formerly Adidas AG, Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd (Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(2) — Trade marks with a reputation — Protection against use of a sign in relation to identical or similar goods or services — Degree of similarity between the mark and the sign — Effect on the public — Sign viewed as an embellishment)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2003 in Case C-408/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden): Adidas-Salomon AG, formerly Adidas AG, Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd (Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(2) — Trade marks with a reputation — Protection against use of a sign in relation to identical or similar goods or services — Degree of similarity between the mark and the sign — Effect on the public — Sign viewed as an embellishment)
OJ C 304, 13.12.2003, p. 5–5
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)