This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TB0100
Case T-100/08 P: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2010 — Kerelov v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Recruitment — General competition — Refusal by the Director of EPSO to communicate to a candidate information and documents relating to the admission test — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case T-100/08 P: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2010 — Kerelov v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Recruitment — General competition — Refusal by the Director of EPSO to communicate to a candidate information and documents relating to the admission test — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case T-100/08 P: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2010 — Kerelov v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Recruitment — General competition — Refusal by the Director of EPSO to communicate to a candidate information and documents relating to the admission test — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 39–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.7.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/39 |
Order of the General Court of 6 May 2010 — Kerelov v Commission
(Case T-100/08 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil Service - Recruitment - General competition - Refusal by the Director of EPSO to communicate to a candidate information and documents relating to the admission test - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2010/C 179/67)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Georgi Kerelov (Pazardzhik, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Kerelov, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and K. Herrmann, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 12 December 2007 in Case F-110/07 Kerelov v Commission, not published in the ECR, asking for that order to be set aside.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Georgi Kerelov is ordered to bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Commission in the context of the present proceedings. |