This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TB0114
Case T-114/08 P: Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case T-114/08 P: Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case T-114/08 P: Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.8.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 205/38 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-114/08 P) (1)
(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation - Lateness - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2009/C 205/70
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 14 December 2007 in Case F-21/07 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order
Operative part of the order
The Court:
1. |
dismisses the appeal; |
2. |
orders Mr Luigi Marcuccio to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities in the present case. |