This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0495
Case T-495/11: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA — Earlier national word mark parameta — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Case T-495/11: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA — Earlier national word mark parameta — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Case T-495/11: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA — Earlier national word mark parameta — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
OJ C 71, 8.3.2014, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.3.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 71/17 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA)
(Case T-495/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA - Earlier national word mark parameta - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings - Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
(2014/C 71/28)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Michael Streng (Erding, Germany) (represented by: A. Pappert, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Fulvio Gismondi (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, G. Petrocchi, M. Bucarelli and F. Bellan, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2011 (Case R 1348/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Michael Streng and Mr Fulvio Gismondi.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Michael Streng to pay the costs. |