This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0052
Case C-52/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 31 January 2013 — Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
Case C-52/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 31 January 2013 — Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
Case C-52/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 31 January 2013 — Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
OJ C 123, 27.4.2013, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.4.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 123/11 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 31 January 2013 — Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
(Case C-52/13)
2013/C 123/16
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Consiglio di Stato
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint
Defendants: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
Question referred
With regard to the protection to be afforded to traders, is Directive 2006/114/EC (1) to be interpreted as referring to advertising that is misleading and at the same time based on unlawful comparison, or to two separate offences, each of which may be relevant in its own right, namely misleading advertising and unlawful comparative advertising?
(1) Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 21.