This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0253
Case T-253/13: Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente (IRAP)
Case T-253/13: Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente (IRAP)
Case T-253/13: Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente (IRAP)
OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 10–10
(HR)
OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 40–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
20.7.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 207/40 |
Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente (IRAP)
(Case T-253/13)
2013/C 207/67
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Orthogen AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Finger and S. Krüger, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente GmbH (Karlsfeld, Germany)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 382/2012-1; |
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘IRAP’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 5, 10, 42 and 44 — Community trade mark No 3 609 121
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente GmbH
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute ground for invalidity; ‘IRAP’ is a commonly used abbreviation for a certain protein which plays a significant role in certain medical and veterinary treatments.
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for a declaration of invalidity granted
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.