Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0457

Case C-457/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 2 October 2014  — Criminal proceedings against Claudia Concu and Isabella Melis

OJ C 439, 8.12.2014, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.12.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/24


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 2 October 2014 — Criminal proceedings against Claudia Concu and Isabella Melis

(Case C-457/14)

(2014/C 439/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari

Parties to the main proceedings

Claudia Concu and Isabella Melis

Questions referred

1)

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C-77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR I-0000] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures?

2)

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates?


Top
  翻译: