This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TB0746(01)
Case T-746/15: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Biofa v Commission (Action for annulment — Plant protection products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 — Approval of the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-746/15: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Biofa v Commission (Action for annulment — Plant protection products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 — Approval of the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-746/15: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Biofa v Commission (Action for annulment — Plant protection products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 — Approval of the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 6, 9.1.2017, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 6/37 |
Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Biofa v Commission
(Case T-746/15) (1)
((Action for annulment - Plant protection products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 - Approval of the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 006/46)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Biofa AG (Münsingen, Germany) (represented by: C. Stallberg and S. Knoblich, and subsequently by C. Stallberg, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Ondrůšek, G. von Rintelen and F. Moro, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 of 17 November 2015 approving the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2015 L 301, p. 42).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Denmark. |
|
3. |
Biofa AG shall pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
|
4. |
The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. |