Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TN0166

Case T-166/15: Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)

OJ C 198, 15.6.2015, p. 40–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.6.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/40


Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)

(Case T-166/15)

(2015/C 198/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Claus Gramberg (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. Kettler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sorouch Mahdavi Sabet (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the design at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 1 968 496-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 460/2013-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and declare Community design No 1 968 496-0002 invalid;

in the alternative,

annul the contested decision and remit the case to the Board of Appeal for a new decision on the invalidity of Community design No 1 968 496-0002;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of 5(1)(b) Regulation No 6/2002;

Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.


Top
  翻译: