This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0739
Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 June 2018.#Akant Monika i Zbigniew Harasym sp. j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark COSIMO — Earlier EU word mark COSIFLOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-739/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 June 2018.
Akant Monika i Zbigniew Harasym sp. j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark COSIMO — Earlier EU word mark COSIFLOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-739/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 June 2018.
Akant Monika i Zbigniew Harasym sp. j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark COSIMO — Earlier EU word mark COSIFLOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-739/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:387