This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0021
Case T-21/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — RL v Court of Justice of the European Union (Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion year — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 10, with effect from 1 July 2015 — Interinstitutional transfer — Prorata temporis system — Comparative examination of the merits — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Liability)
Case T-21/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — RL v Court of Justice of the European Union (Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion year — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 10, with effect from 1 July 2015 — Interinstitutional transfer — Prorata temporis system — Comparative examination of the merits — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Liability)
Case T-21/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — RL v Court of Justice of the European Union (Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion year — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 10, with effect from 1 July 2015 — Interinstitutional transfer — Prorata temporis system — Comparative examination of the merits — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Liability)
OJ C 52, 12.2.2018, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.2.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 52/28 |
Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — RL v Court of Justice of the European Union
(Case T-21/17) (1)
((Civil Service - Officials - Promotion - 2015 promotion year - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 10, with effect from 1 July 2015 - Interinstitutional transfer - Prorata temporis system - Comparative examination of the merits - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Liability))
(2018/C 052/39)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: RL (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and V. Hanley-Emilsson, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application on the basis of 270 TFEU and seeking, firstly, the annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 11 May 2016 refusing to promote the application on 1 July 2015 and, secondly, compensation for the loss which the applicant allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders RL to pay the costs. |