This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0566
Case T-566/17: Action brought on 21 August 2017 — Molina García v SRB
Case T-566/17: Action brought on 21 August 2017 — Molina García v SRB
Case T-566/17: Action brought on 21 August 2017 — Molina García v SRB
OJ C 374, 6.11.2017, p. 39–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.11.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 374/39 |
Action brought on 21 August 2017 — Molina García v SRB
(Case T-566/17)
(2017/C 374/59)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Jerónimo Molina García (Puente Genil, Spain) (represented by: A. Velasco Albalá, lawyer)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that General Court should:
|
— |
Annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
Accept the consequences of the decision of the Single Resolution Board which was adopted erroneously, either because of lack of transparency or because of failure to take prior preventive measures which would have avoided the loss of shareholders’ capital through its depreciation and, consequently, order the payment of compensation to the applicant in the amount of the loss resulting from the erroneous procedure and decision, namely EUR 7 805,29. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.