This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0231
Case T-231/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili) [EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Djili — Earlier national word mark GILLY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]
Case T-231/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili) [EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Djili — Earlier national word mark GILLY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]
Case T-231/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili) [EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Djili — Earlier national word mark GILLY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]
OJ C 122, 1.4.2019, p. 18–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
1.4.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 122/18 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili)
(Case T-231/18) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Djili - Earlier national word mark GILLY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 122/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam (Dulovo, Bulgaria) (represented by C.-R. Romițan, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by D. Gája and D. Walicka, and subsequently by D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Victor Lupu (Bucharest, Romania)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 January 2018 (Case R 1902/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Lupu and Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam to pay the costs. |