This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0030
Case T-30/18: Action brought on 23 January 2018 — Yado v EUIPO — Dvectis CZ (seat cushion)
Case T-30/18: Action brought on 23 January 2018 — Yado v EUIPO — Dvectis CZ (seat cushion)
Case T-30/18: Action brought on 23 January 2018 — Yado v EUIPO — Dvectis CZ (seat cushion)
OJ C 94, 12.3.2018, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.3.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 94/34 |
Action brought on 23 January 2018 — Yado v EUIPO — Dvectis CZ (seat cushion)
(Case T-30/18)
(2018/C 094/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: Slovak
Parties
Applicant: Yado s.r.o. (Handlová, Slovakia) (represented by: D. Futej, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dvectis CZ s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: European Union design No 2 371 591-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 November 2017 in Case R 1017/2017-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision declaring the appeal inadmissible; |
|
— |
order the defendant to deal with the appeal and give a ruling thereon; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Error in law for the purpose of Article 57 of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 65 of Regulation No 2245/2002; |
|
— |
Infringement of the applicant’s fundamental right to be heard; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002 |