This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0131
Case T-131/19: Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament
Case T-131/19: Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament
Case T-131/19: Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament
OJ C 148, 29.4.2019, p. 55–56
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.4.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 148/55 |
Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament
(Case T-131/19)
(2019/C 148/54)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Marc Oosterbosch (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare that the present application is admissible and well founded; |
consequently:
|
— |
annul the ‘contested decision’ comprising the payslips for the months of March, April and June 2018; |
|
— |
declare, if necessary, that the decision of 6 November 2018 rejecting the complaint is annulled; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, based on infringement of the principles of legality and legal certainty and a plea of illegality: the contested decision was taken on the basis of unlawful internal rules and implementing provisions.